|
IBC2000-8 Production
Feeding Bison Bulls
for Meat Dr.
Vern Anderson
Carrington Research Extension Center
North Dakota State University
Box 219
Carrington ND USA 58421
| The following
article was originally presented at the International Bison
Conference in Edmonton, Alberta in August 2000. The
conference covered a wide array of bison topics including
production, marketing, genetics, history and much more.
This article has been reprinted with the permission of the
IBC2000 Chairman. |
Abstract
Bison bulls are fed grain for a period of time prior to harvest
to provide a consistent product to consumers.
Little information is available on feeds, feeding systems,
and optimum management of bison bulls fed for meat.
Many producers are using highly variable feeds (screenings)
with low cost being the primary criterion.
Higher energy diets using grains at up to 75% of the diet
have provided more rapid and economical gains in replicated research
trials. Season,
particularly winter, has a detrimental effect on feed intake and
gain. Bison respond
negatively to stress from working the animals for weighing or
vaccinating. Animal performance is also negatively affected by adding or
removing animals from a feeding pen.
There is a great need for more bison nutrition research to
determine basic nutrient requirements as well as practical and
economical approaches to feeding.
Keywords
Bison, Nutrition, Feeding, Season, Energy
Introduction
One of the most challenging segments of the entire bison industry is
the nutrition and management of bison bulls from weaning to
slaughter. This segment
is particularly challenging because bison produce modest gains from
self-limited intake and exhibit highly variable and mediocre feed
conversion. Further
complicating this feeding period is the effect of season as winter
decreases intake and reduces performance. We need to determine the
most economical feeding regimes while maintaining an appropriate
environment for bison with the goal of producing a quality meat
product for repeat consumer demand.
Feeding
Research
Bison producers feeding smaller numbers of animals are using
self feeders for the concentrate and hay components of the diet.
They are using a variety of feeds in diets that vary widely
in ingredients (Table 1) with the major criterion being price per
ton (Anderson and Sexhus 1996).
Little attention is being paid to nutritional content or cost
per nutrient at this time. Several
feeds have shown promise in improving gains based on energy
concentration (Anderson and Miller 1997).
While wheat screenings based diets produce highly variable
gains, conventional grains such as corn and barley are consistent
and generally produce lower cost of gain (Table 2).
Rolling corn improved gains over whole corn (Anderson and
Miller 1999). There is
an upper limit to grain inclusion with data from Stanton et al.
(1996). They fed grain
at 30, 50, 70, and 90% of the diet, and concluded that there was no
improvement in feeding grain at higher than 70% of the ration (Table
3). We have concluded
that the forage component of bison diets is important to optimum
rumen function.
Table
1. Producer survey data from bison feeders in North and South
Dakota
| Ingredient |
Number of
Producers |
Average % of
diet |
Range of use |
| Wheat screenings |
14 |
77 |
25-100 |
| Corn |
8 |
25 |
10-75 |
| Barley |
7 |
61 |
25-100 |
| Oats |
5 |
43 |
25-67 |
| Gain data |
Number of
producers |
Average daily
gain |
Range of ADG |
| Wheat screenings |
6 |
1.54 |
1.0-1.9 |
| Barley |
3 |
1.59 |
1.3-2.0 |
| Other (incl.
silage) |
3 |
1.84 |
1.6-2.2 |
Table
2. Performance of feedlot bison on two energy levels, two corn
types and two processing methods
| Item |
Treatment |
|
|
| Pelleted
Wheat Screenings |
Rolled
Dent Corn |
Rolled
Waxy Corn |
Whole
Waxy Corn |
StErr |
| Total
DM Intake lb/hd/day |
16.96 |
19.45 |
19.40 |
19.65 |
1.50 |
| DM
Intake, % Body Wt |
2.32 |
2.30 |
2.29 |
2.35 |
3.21 |
| ADG,
lb/hd/day |
1.35 |
1.63 |
1.68 |
1.46 |
0.29 |
| DM/Gain |
16.46 |
21.21 |
11.87 |
15.03 |
1.44 |
Table
3. Effect of concentrate level on performance of bison bulls
fed for meatz
| Item |
Concentrate
Level |
| 30% |
50% |
70% |
90% |
| Dry
matter intake, lb |
16.87 |
17.53 |
16.87 |
17.71 |
| Avg
daily gain, lb/hd/day |
1.32 |
1.48 |
1.58 |
1.63 |
| Feed
efficiency |
12.36 |
11.96 |
10.73 |
10.80 |
ZReprinted
from (Stanton et al. 1996)
More
recent data on the length of grain feeding for bison has been
developed by Anderson and Bock (2000).
They extended the forage feeding window with four treatments
using cooperating producers to gather data (Fig. 1).
Intake during the feeding sector increased with older bulls
that had been fed forage for longer periods of time (Table 4).
Gains improved during the feeding sector (Table 5) but
overall gains, feed efficiency, and carcass quality tended to
decrease with increasing time fed forage.
Cost
per pound of gain appeared to favor the intermediate treatments.
Click
on blue icon for full view

Fig. 1. Schematic
diagram of seasonal treatments
for maximizing forage and minimizing grain in bison fed for meat
(Anderson and Bock, 2000)
Table
4. Performance of bison bulls when maximizing forage and
minimizing grain intake from weaning to marketz
| Item |
Treatmentsy |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| Dry
matter intake, lb |
16.84 |
19.04 |
18.18 |
22.37 |
| Avg
daily gain, lb/hd/day |
1.22 |
1.23 |
1.11 |
1.12 |
| Feed/gain |
13.8 |
15.5 |
16.3 |
20.0 |
| Days
on feed |
488 |
473 |
492 |
502 |
| Days
fed grain |
488 |
401 |
232 |
139 |
| Feed
cost/lb gain. $ |
0.44 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.50 |
| %#1
Carcasses |
87.8 |
77.0 |
62.1 |
72.7 |
zReprinted
from Anderson and Bock, 2000.
YTreatments
correspond with treatments described in Fig. 1.
Comparisons
of feed delivery systems for bison bulls were made using self
feeders, timed delivery feeders, daily grain feeding in a fenceline
bunk and total mixed rations (Table 6). Little difference was
observed in animal performance, however feed efficiency favored the
total mixed rations where no waste was observed (Anderson and Miller
1999). This feeding
methods requires a minimum number of animals estimated to be 150 to
200 head to justify labor and equipment for daily chores.
Table
5. Average daily gain (lb.) by period for bison bulls when
maximizing forage and minimizing grain intake from weaning to marketz
| Item |
Treatments |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| Period
1 |
Grain
1.36 |
Hay
0.36 |
Hay
0.26 |
Hay
No data |
| Period
2 |
Grain
1.52 |
Grain
1.54 |
Pasture
1.28 |
Pasture
0.91 |
| Period
3 |
Grain
0.80 |
Grain
1.34 |
Grain
1.39 |
Hay
0.44 |
| Period
4 |
|
|
|
Grain
1.89 |
zReprinted
from Anderson and Bock, 2000.
YTreatments
correspond with treatments described in Fig. 1.
Table
6. Effect of feeding system on feedlot performance of bison
bulls
| Item |
Feeding
System |
StErr |
| TMR |
Separate
Grain/Hay |
Automatic
Feeder |
Self
Feeder |
| DM
Intake, lb/hd/day |
24.26a |
26.35b |
26.70b |
27.65b |
1.06 |
| ADG,
lb/hd/day |
1.39 |
1.37 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
.33 |
| DB/Gain |
17.46 |
19.27 |
17.81 |
18.44 |
.99 |
a,
b, c
- values with different superscripts are significantly different,
(P<.05)
Season
significantly affects bison performance with winter feed intake
and gain lower than the other three seasons (Stanton et al. 1996;
Anderson and Miller 1997, 1999; Church et al. 1999).
Altering diets during the winter may lead to lower cost of
gain but what approach to take is not well understood.
Research underway at the North Dakota State University (NDSU)
Carrington Center is evaluating stepped grain levels during the
winter and their effect on gains during the subsequent seasons.
Compensatory gains during the spring and summer may be more
cost effective than grain feeding throughout the winter. The severity of the winter in terms of length and severity of
cold temperatures and snow may play a role in bison performance
according to the Carrington study.
Future
Research Needs
There
is a great need for good scientific bison nutrition research.
In addition to formal replicated research trials, much can
be learned from the producers who have been feeding bison if the
data can be summarized and interpreted.
Basic nutrient requirements need to be established for
protein, energy for maintenance and gain, and for minerals for
animals of different ages and sex and for different seasons of the
year. Practical
feeding methods can be enhanced with applied studies that use
available feeds and forages.
A research facility for bison nutrition is under
construction at the NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center.
Summary/Recommendations
Bison
bulls need to be fed a diet with energy concentration high enough
to produce economical gains.
More predictable performance can be achieved with
conventional grains than with screenings based feeds.
Diets of 75% grain are recommended for at least 100 days
prior to marketing animals by most bison associations to insure
uniform and palatable meat products.
Rations with moist feeds such as silage appear to be more
palatable. Animal
movement should be limited as stress significantly decreases feed
intake and gain. Handling
animals during weighing or vaccinating creates stress and adding
or removing animals from a pen disrupts the social structure of
the pen. An “all
in” “all out” pen management approach is recommended.
Acknowledgments
Appreciation
is expressed to the following for support and/or contributions to
the bison research cited.
Minnesota
Buffalo Association
North
Dakota Army National Guard
National
Bison Association
North
Dakota Buffalo Association
Northwest
Bison Association
Northeast
Bison Association
North
Dakota Agricultural Products Utilization Commission
North
Dakota Corn Council
Peace
Country Bison Association
USDA-National
Research Initiative Competitive Grants (Equipment)
References
Anderson,
V. L. and E. Bock. 2000. Maximizing forage and minimizing grain
intake in bison fed for meat.
Bison research report.
North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station. Volume
1:10-15
Anderson
V. L. and B. Miller. 1997. Influence of season and diet on feedlot
performance of bison. Prof.
An. Sci. 13:14-17.
Anderson,
V. L. and B. Miller. 1999. Practical lessons in feeding bison
bulls for meat. J. Anim. Sci. 77:45(Abstract).
Anderson,
V. L. and D. Sexhus. 1996. Practices and priorities of bison
feeders in the Northern Plains.
Beef and Bison Field Day Proceedings.
Carrington Research Extension Center, NDSU. Vol. 19:25-29
Church,
J. S., R. J. Hudson and B. D. Rutley. 1999.
Performance of American bison (Bos
bison) in feedlots. J.
Anim. Feed Sci. 8: 513-523.
Stanton,
T. L, D. Schutz, M. McFarlane, R. Seedig and D. Stewart. 1996.
Concentrate levels in bison finishing rations on feedyard
performance. Prof.
An. Sci. 12:6.
|