Comparative Winter Bioenergetics of American Bison, Yak, Scottish Highland and Hereford Calves
R. J. Christopherson, R. J. Hudson & R. J. Richmond
Dept. Animal Sci., Univ. Alberta.
Edmonton, Canada T6G 2E3
Reprinted from ACTA Theriologica Vol. 23, 2: 49-54, 1978
Summary
American bison; yak, Scottish Highland and Hereford calves were used in a comparative study of metabolic responses to temperature or 20, 0 and -30(C. Metabolic rates were lowest in the bison, highest in the Herefords and intermediate in the Highland and yak. Critical temperatures and thermal insulations as calculated from metabolic responses to three ambient temperatures suggested that the bison were most tolerant to cold and that the Herefords were least tolerant. Highland and yak were intermediate and comparable in this regard.
INTRODUCTION
A large proportion of Northern and Western Canada is considered marginal for traditional systems of agricultural production. However, growing human populations in these areas have created increasing demands for agricultural commodities, particularly animal products. Although intensive production techniques permit livestock to be raised in very harsh environments, input costs are prohibitive. This has lead to an evaluation of alternative animal species which could make more efficient use of such areas and, in particular, survive the long harsh winters with minimal care.
American bison (Bison bison), yak (Bos grunniens) and Scottish Highland cattle (Bos taurus) have relatively deep and dense hair coats and are considered to be quite cold tolerant (Peters & Slen, 1964). Although a number of breeds of cattle have been studied (Webster, 1971; Webster et al., 1970) there is no quantitative data on the metabolic responses of bison and yak during cold exposure. The objectives of this study were to compare feed intakes, metabolic rates, thermal insulations and lower critical temperatures of bison, yak, Scottish Highland and Hereford calves during winter.
EXPERIMENTAL
A total of eight calves including two yak, two American bison, two Scottish Highland and two Hereford were kept in outdoor pens with access to an open south facing shed. Except for one young bull bison, all animals were heifers. They were obtained and assembled into groups in early November at about 5 months of age and were trained for use in metabolic trials for two months prior to the three month experimental period.
The calves were offered a ration consisting of 50 percent chopped alfalfa - brome hay and 50 percent concentrate at a rate of 100 g/kg .75/day. Each 100 kg of concentrate contained 91 kg barley, 6 kg rapeseed meal, 2 kg cobalt-iodized salt, 0.6 kg dicalcium phosphate and 0.4 kg vitamin A premix.
The calves were confined in individual feeding stalls overnight from approximately 16.30 hours to 09.30 hours for provision of the daily ration. Feed intake of individual animals was recorded daily and live weight was measured at weekly intervals.
Measurements were made of the metabolic rate of each calf during late January, February and March while exposed to experimental temperatures of +20, 0 and -30°C. Metabolic rates were measured during the 2nd or 3rd hour of exposure to each temperature using a custom-designed closed circuit indirect calorimeter. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were measured in a sealed refrigerated chamber of known volume which was periodically flushed with atmospheric air. The concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the chamber were measured using the respiratory pattern analyzer described by Young et al. (1975). Heat production (Hp) was calculated from respiratory gas exchange using the equation of Brouwer (1965):
Hp (kca1/hr)=02 (litres.h-1) X3.866+CO2 (litres-1)X1.200
Total thermal insulations and lower critical temperatures were estimated from the extent of the metabolic responses to cold. Total thermal insulation (I) was calculated from the following equation:
I=(Tb-Ta)IHn (1)
where Tb=body core temperature (°C)
Ta=air temperature (°C)
Hn=sensible heat loss (Mcal.M-2.24 h-l)
I=thermal insulation (C.Mcal-1.M224 h).
Equation 1 is an oversimplification since it neglects the resistance to tissue conduction of the heat that is lost by evaporation from the surface of the skin and respiratory passages.
Sensible heat loss (Hn) was estimated from the following relationship:
Hp+Hs=Hl=Hn+He
where Hp= rate of heat production
Hl= rate of total heat loss
He=rate of evaporative heat loss
Hs=rate of body heat storage per unit time
At temperatures below the thermo neutral zone, He was assumed to be consistent with a value of 0.3 Mcal.M-2.24 h-1 (Webster, 1971) and changes in body heat storage (Hs) were assumed to be negligible during the periods when measurements of heat production were made. Hence for the present application equation (2) was simplified as follows:
Hp=Hn+O.3 (3)
The estimations of Hn from Hp measured during exposure of the calves to -30oC were, then substituted in equation (1) in order to calculate total insulation(I).
Lower critical temperature (Tac) was calculated from the following equation described by Webster (1971):
Tac=(Tb+O.3 Ie)-HP * (It+le) (4)
Where Tb=body core temperature
Ie=external insulation
It=tissue insulation
Hp *=Rate of heat production in a thermoneutral environment.
Tissue insulation (It) was estimated according to the following equation (Webster, 1971):
It=5.50+0.018 W+O.O99 Ta (5)
where W=body weight (kg)
Ta=air temperature below °C.
External insulation (le) was calcu1ated by subtracting tissue insulation from total insulation:
Ie=I-It (6)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In spite of the small sample sizes, significant (P<.01) contrasts were found among species in feed intake, weight change and bioenergetic characteristics. Average daily feed intakes and body weight changes are summarized in Table 1. Hereford calves consumed their entire daily ration whereas Highland, yak and bison calves did not consume their entire feed allocation. The yak had the lowest daily feed intake on a metabolic weight basis (kg.75) followed by bison, Highland and finally Hereford in order of increasing voluntary consumption. This pattern paralleled results of a previous study (Richmond et al., 1977). Average daily gains reflected species-typical feed intakes ranging from only 0.112 kg.d-l in the yak to 0.710 kg.d-l in the Herefords. Since the average feed intake of the yak was only slightly above maintenance and weight gains were small, their feed: gain ratio was poor. These ratios were more favorable for the Highland, Hereford and bison. Bison and Highland were comparable with only slightly lower feed gain ratios than the Hereford.
The metabolic rates of the calves are summarized in Table 2. Energy expenditures over the complete range of experimental conditions generally were lowest in the bison, highest in the Herefords and intermediate in the Highland and the yak. Values in all species were higher in March than in January and February.
Table 1: Feed intake, initial weight, average daily gain and feed/gain ratios for a 96 day winter feeding period.
Feed intake | Initial Wt. | Average daily gain | Feed/gain | ||
gm/kg .75/day | kg/day | kg | kg/day | ratio | |
Yak | 65 | 2.34 | 110.9 | 0.112 | 20.9 |
Bison | 81 | 3.25 | 117.9 | 0.421 | 7.71 |
Hereford | 100 | 5.07 | 157.8 | 0.710 | 7.14 |
Highland | 92 | 4.51 | 152.8 | 0.615 | 7.62 |
Species differences significant at p < 0.001 |
Table 2: Metabolic rate (kcal/kg.75/day) of calves during winter.
Species | Temp., oC | Jan | Feb | March |
Yak | 20 0 -30 |
128.2 123.4 146.2 |
111.7 137.2 150.1 |
143.5 164.2 181.8 |
Bison | 20 0 -30 |
118.2 117.9 90.7 |
105.3 124.0 104.6 |
160.4 168.6 135.4 |
Hereford | 20 0 -30 |
138.7 146.5 186.2 |
141.8 152.0 186.1 |
155.7 174.2 259.8 |
Highland | 20 0 -30 |
109.0 127.9 137.4 |
116.6 133.7 136.8 |
132.9 144.7 171.3 |
Mean monthly temperature,°C |
-10.2 (-42.0 to 7.8)2 |
-8.5 (-29 to 10) |
-5.6 (-34 to 11) |
1 Species and date significant at P<.01
2 Values in parenthesis indicate range of temperatures
Metabolic responses to cold from which thermal insulations and critical temperatures were calculated, differed markedly among each of the bovids. Metabolic rates of Highland, Hereford and yak increased during exposure to -30°C compared to metabolic rates at 0°C and 20°C indicating that -30oC was below their lower critical temperatures. One of the most striking observations was the qualitatively different response of bison to intense cold. Whereas the other species increased metabolic rates to offset heat loss, the bison reduced metabolic rates during all periods of exposure to temperatures of -30oC. It can be speculated that the major adaptive significance of this characteristic may be the reduction of expenditure of energy reserves at a time when cold stress and food deprivation are superimposed. The bison may use thermal inertia to deal with cold in a manner similar to that used by the camel or eland to combat periodic heat loads (Taylor, 1975).
In order to calculate thermal insulation values (equation 1), estimates of heat loss must be made while the animals are exposed to an environmental temperature below their critical temperature even at -30oC it was not possible to determine their true insulation values.
Therefore, estimates of total insulation which were considered minimal were made for the bison. Insulation values (Table 3) were lowest for the Herefords, highest for the bison and intermediate for yak and Highland. Insulation values for all animals were highest in January and February with a sharp decline in March. The estimates of the lower critical temperatures of the four groups of bovids are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Thermoneutral heat production and estimates of total insulation and lower critical temperature of calves during winter:
January | February | March | ||
Total insulation C.m.24 hr/Mcal * |
Yak Bison Hereford Highland |
32.2 >59.1 24.5 35.4 |
31.4 >46.7 23.2 33.7 |
26.6 >33.5 16.2 27.6 |
Heat production Mcal/m2/24 hr * |
Yak Bison Hereford Highland |
2.11 1.97 2.37 1.86 |
1.84 1.77 2.44 2.00 |
2.38 2.72 2.70 2.31 |
Lower critical.temp. °C |
Yak Bison Hereford Highland |
-16 <-40 -12 -16 |
-11 <-30 -14 -20 |
-17 <-40 -3 -14 |
*m2=surface area (square meters) was calculated from the following formula:
m2=0.09 W .67, where W=body weight in kg (Mitche1l, 1928).
Experimental findings agreed with what is known about the ecology of each species. The range of the bison in North America extends into relatively inhospitable climates characterized by long sieges of intense cold. The yak lives in cold mountainous environments but is able to migrate seasonally to seek favorable microclimates. The Highland breed was selected for damp cool environments whereas the Hereford was selected in areas with more moderate winter conditions.